Collins said that while all aircraft differed, a pilot would usually undergo training to fly a specific aircraft type.
Was wind a factor?
Bureau of Meteorology daily recorded observations shows the wind speed at Rottnest Island at 3pm on Tuesday was 48km/h, the highest it had been recorded at that time in the last week, but some wind gusts of 69km/h had been recorded at other times.
Three people are dead after a seaplane crashed at Rottnest Island.Credit: Nine
“It did look a little bit a little bit choppy, maybe that’s why he rotated a little bit early,” Collins said.
“But it looks like he was close to being into wind. Whether he saw something in the water, whether there’s a rock, there’s an obstacle, whether there’s something he tried to get out of the water early, I just don’t know.”
Collins said lack of forward speed has caused the plane to nosedive.
“He rotated too early and the aircraft didn’t have enough forward speed and when you don’t have enough forward speed, the airflow over the wing is no longer laminar, it becomes turbulent in the air,” he said.
“People think that air goes under the wing to make an airplane fly. Actually, an airplane is almost sucked up into the air.
“The air going over the top of the wing is fast, and it creates low pressure which allows the aircraft to climb.
“So once you’ve got any deterioration in the quality of the air going over the wing, which could be caused by insufficient speed, too much angle of attack, it gets turbulent, then you lose lift, and that’s when you get a stall.”
Loading
Officers from the Australian Transport Safety Bureau are expected to arrive at the island on Wednesday to investigate what went wrong.
Investigators would speak to the four remaining survivors and any other witnesses, and would collect relevant recorded information including available flight tracking data, as well as pilot and aircraft maintenance records, and weather information.
Two parts of the plane have been recovered. The pontoon was found on a beach a couple of kilometres from the crash site, and police took another piece of the wreckage to a forensic holding yard.
Australian Transport Safety Bureau Chief Commissioner Angus Mitchell told 6PR Radio on Wednesday he was on his way to Perth to begin investigating the incident.
“Our job is to piece together some of that wreckage but also to have a look at the systems that are in place to keep operations like this as safe as they can be and what are the recommendations,” he said.
“That will take us some time.
“Our priority now will be looking at the wreckage itself and starting to piece together the sequence of events.”
Mitchell said the bureau may need to take some of the plane’s components back to its lab in Canberra for further analysis, including footage of the crash from onlookers.
“Mobiles phones, anything on board the aircraft, any flight tracking data,” he said.
“There’s a whole range of evidence that we use in an incident like this.”
He said the plane may have an SD card that would capture some of its information, helping investigators figure out what went wrong.
“They’re the sorts of things we’ll get a better appreciation of once we examine the wreckage,” he said.
“It’s fair to say there will be a lot of evidence that will assist us in this case.”
Collins said the Cessna 208 Caravan was one of the most popular and safest planes of its type.
“The Caravan is certified for and regularly configured for float plane operations. It is also certified to fly single engine IFR and is used for cargo operations in all legal weather conditions in the USA day and night,” he said.
Start the day with a summary of the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.
Read the full article here
